• Sat. Sep 24th, 2022


Bank Of America CISCO Mcast news

Cisco beats again $371 mln patent lawsuit after Boston trial


Sep 2, 2022

An indication bearing the brand for communications and safety tech big Cisco Programs Inc is seen exterior considered one of its places of work in San Jose, California, U.S. REUTERS/Paresh Dave

Register now for FREE limitless entry to Reuters.com

  • Egenera stated Cisco stole expertise for computing platform
  • Massachusetts firm had requested for no less than $371 million in damages

(Reuters) – Cisco Programs Inc’s data-center platforms don’t violate a patent owned by Massachusetts-based computing firm Egenera Inc, a Boston federal jury stated in a verdict made public Tuesday.

The jury rejected Egenera’s long-running declare that Cisco’s Unified Computing System (UCS) platform infringes a patent associated to pc networking.

Egenera had requested the courtroom for no less than $371 million in damages, a Cisco spokesperson stated.

Register now for FREE limitless entry to Reuters.com

One other Cisco spokesperson stated the corporate was “extremely happy with our engineers and our confirmed monitor file of delivering innovation to fulfill the wants of our prospects and companions.”

Egenera and its attorneys didn’t instantly reply to requests for remark.

Egenera sued San Jose, California-based Cisco in 2016. It alleged the united statesline of data-server merchandise was “tied to pioneering work completed and patented by Egenera,” and stated Cisco copied its expertise after discussing a possible collaboration and hiring away its staff.

The patent at challenge covers digital pc networks that may be reconfigured rapidly primarily based on how a lot computing energy is required. A Massachusetts federal choose declared the patent invalid in 2019 after discovering Egenera did not checklist the entire related inventors, however the U.S. Court docket of Appeals for the Federal Circuit revived it and the case in 2020.

The jury determined Monday that Cisco didn’t infringe the patent. It additionally rejected Cisco’s argument that the patent was invalid.

The case is Egenera Inc v. Cisco Programs Inc, U.S. District Court docket for the District of Massachusetts, No. 1:16-cv-11613.

For Egenera: Andrew Thomases, James Batchelder, Steven Pepe and Samuel Brenner of Ropes & Grey; Mike McCool, Avery Williams, John Campbell and James Quigley of McKool Smith

For Cisco: John Desmarais, Jonas McDavit, Tamir Packin and Peter Magic of Desmarais

Learn extra:

Fed Circuit revives patent case in opposition to Cisco, brushing apart inventorship defect

Cisco will get Fed Circuit win in patent battle with smaller rival

Register now for FREE limitless entry to Reuters.com

Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Belief Rules.

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.